The Way of Jesus Christ Essay -- Religion, Messianic Jewish Faith, Chr

The German scholar and theologian Jrgen Moltmann wrote a powerful cultivate called The Way of messiah Christ. In his book, Moltmann, blends Judaism and Christianity together to form what is called messianic Judaic faith. Messianic Judaism is a religious movement that adds to Evangelical Christian divinity with elements of Jewish terminology and ritual. He connects the Old volition with the New Testament and believes thither must be a connection between the messianic and the Christian perspective of Christology. Moltmanns statement in chapter champion supports his idea that there are historical presuppositions that we must understand from the Old Testament forward we can understand New Testament Christology. Moltmann states, there is no much(prenominal) thing as Christology without presuppositions and its historical presupposition is the messianic promise of the Old Testament, and the Jewish hope which is found on the Hebrew Bible. He believes that to be in possession of an brain of Jesus we must have a historical understanding of the Old Testament promises and the historic Israel together. He furthered states that we must look at the name Christ as an adjective or descriptive countersign and not as a noun. He does as a focusing to translate Christ back into its proper term Messiah (1). eve the term Christian in Moltmanns understanding of Christology lacks the proper terminology to make out it significant in meaning. He states, Christian means, being human in the messianic sense. The name of Christian is not a detonation of a party. It is a promise. It is what is messianic (1). However, as good as this might wholesome Moltmanns perspective amalgamates liberation and feminist theologies with that of the Roman Catholic Eastern Jewish-Orthodox thought into his mess... ...views of Christology by stating if you reject any of the three dimensions, the results will be fatal (150). When you consider Moltmanns understanding of his three-di mensional Christ, he has a reasonable argument for Christology. Moltmanns conclusions of Gods humanity and divinity have valid arguments and biblical support. nonpareil would have a hard time disagreeing with Moltmanns three dimensions of the person of Jesus Christ. However, you cannot overlook mainstream traditionalism in our nightspot and say that if you deny one or the other there is a fatal theological flaw. Our society is evidence to the fact that most Christians perceive Christ only in his divine state or, as Moltmann would say, as a theological person of Christ. Even in this state of being, Christ is still the Savior who reaches to the sick, the blood brother of the poor, and the comrade of the people.