HIstorical Film Assignment on JFK Movie Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

HIstorical Film Assignment on JFK - Movie Review ExampleThe Warren focussing headed by Chief Justice Earl Warren along with other investigating authorities such as House Select Committee FBI and Dallas police issued reports identifying Oswald as the sole assassin. A gallop poll conducted after(prenominal) 30 years of assassination indicates that 75% of Americans still believe in conspiracy theories (McCauley & Jacques, 1979). However, the conclusions made by these reports on assumption that Oswald was guilty, even triggered conspiracy theories ab step to the fore the involvement of federal agencies in the assassination (Kurtz, 1982). JFK is a 1991 motion picture, which examines the various events leading to the murder of President John F. Kennedy as explored by New siege of Orleans District Attorney, Jim Garrison. From his existing knowledge and what he learned about links to the murder subsequently, Garrison suspects some(prenominal) loopholes in FBIs official story. He reopens i nvestigation in 1966 after reading the warrens report, which convinced him of the legion(predicate) inaccuracies and conflicts in the governments story. ... Garrison presents evidence in court in the trial proceedings of Clay Shaw. However, in the endings, Shaw was acquitted of those allegations and Garrison stated that he will continue to dig out the truth. Though director Oliver Stone was severely criticized for distorting history, his film provoked calls and eventually succeeded in declassification of few unavowed documents relevant to the assassination (Benoit, 1998). The character portraits were criticized of being unauthentic. For instance, the original character of Garrison was totally inverted and his disposition was falsely portrayed as a sympathetic figure in the film. The beating of Martin Jack, a historically dubious character, by Banister was exaggerated and the reasons altered in the film. The death of Ferrie was shown to be a murder, spot he actually died of natu ral causes. Andrews claim about Shaw and Bertrand being the same person was falsely represent in the film. In actuality, Andrews totally denied this assumption and never testified to the fact. The witness Perry Russo, who was the key character in real Garrisons case, was completely ignored and film substituted her with a fictional character OKeefe (Smolla, 1992 Lambert, 1998). The reputation of Shaw was greatly distorted as an arrogant, overt homosexual, while in truth he was a consider individual. There was no such character as X in reality, but fictional and in general based on Col. Prouty who actually had no access to secret service or inside information. JFK asserts that Lyndon Johnson converse Kennedys new withdrawal policy from the Vietnam War, while as evident from declassified documents, the memorandum was drafted when Kennedy was